Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4087 (CHH)

KU. MUKTI XAXA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/449/2025 · 2025-05-09

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Dated 10th May, 2025 CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT CAMPUS-BILASPUR 2025:CGHC:21963 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 449 of 2025 Ku. Mukti Xaxa D/o Shri Brijilyus Xaxa Aged About 40 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Panchayat Secretary And Posted At Village- Panchayat- Sarangpur, Janpad Panchayat- Balrampur Distt- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan Atalnagar Nava Raipur Distt- Raipur C.G. 2 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Balrampur, Distt- Balrampur- Ramanujganj C.G. 3 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat- Balrampur, Distt- Balrampur- Ramanujganj C.G. 4 - Deepak Baul Working On The Post Of Panchayat Secretary, Posted At Village Panchayat - Ramnagarkala, Janpad Panchayat-Balrampur, Distt- Balrampur- Ramanujganj C.G. ...Respondents (Cause title taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Kum.Mukti Xaxa, in person For Respondent/State : Ms Sunita Manikpuri, Dy GA For Respondent-3 : Shri Rakesh Kumar Jha, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Order (Passed on 10th May, 2025) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 29.10.2024 passed by respondent-2, whereby petitioner has been transferred from Gram Panchayat- Sarangpur to Radhakrishn Nagar, and there is an Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.05.15 11:52:56 +0530 Wps 449 of 2024 2 interim order dated 17.01.2025 in favour of the petitioner, and she is still working at Gram Panchayat- Sarangpur. Now, she is willing to move an application before the authorities, and does not want to prosecute the petition any further. 2. Above submission made by the petitioner was not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents-2 and 3. 3. In view of submission made by the petitioner herself, present petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (MPS Bhatia) Judge-Lok Adalat Member-Lok Adalat Bilaspur Bilaspur padma