Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40866 (CHH)

SMT. SUSHMATI LAKDA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10062/2025 · 2025-09-01

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:44564 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10062 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sushmati Lakda W/o David Lakda Aged About 40 Years R/o Rijhanapara, Premnagar, District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Joint Director School Education Department, Surguja Division, District- Surguja (C.G.) 3 - Collector Surajpur, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Surajpur, District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Mayur Khandelwal, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 02.09.2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition against the impugned order dated 04.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Rijhanabahra, Premnagar, District-Surajpur to Kantaroli, Block-Premnagar, District-Surajpur, under the Rationalization Instructions dated 02.08.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.09.03 11:02:47 +0530 Wps 10062 of 2025 2 Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner by passing a reasoned order. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma