Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40863 (PNJ)

POONAM MIGLANI v. M/S ATMA RAM RULDU RAM

CRM-M/19586/2024 · 2025-04-08

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

281-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19586-2024 Date of decision: 08.04.2025 Poonam Miglani ....Petitioner Versus M/s Atma Ram Ruldu Ram ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Ms. Sarita, Advocate for Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the respondent. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of complaint No.1777 of 2019 dated 11.12.2019 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition as the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled. Dismissed as withdrawn. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 08.04.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neha 2025.04.08 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document