Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40860 (CHH)

KHOGESHWAR MANJHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10075/2025 · 2025-08-27

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:43539 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10075 of 2025 1 - Khogeshwar Manjhi S/o Shri Lambodar Manjhi Aged About 36 Years Posted As Asst. Teacher (L.B.), At Govt. Primary School Mudgelmal, Block- Mainpur, District- Gariyaband, (C.G.) 2 - Kalyan Singh Dewangan S/o Shri Tilak Ram Dewangan Aged About 56 Years Posted As Asst. Teacher (L.B.), At Govt. Primary School Mudaganv, Block- Mainpur, District- Gariyaband, (C.G.) 3 - Beni Ram Tandan S/o Shri Dharmu Das Tandan Aged About 44 Years Posted As Asst. Teacher (L.B.), At Govt. Primary School Dhuruwapathara, Block- Mainpur, District- Gariyaband, (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Chnchalay Manjhi W/o Shri Dilendra Kumar Manjhi Aged About 35 Years Posted As Headmaster, At Govt. Primary School Dongribhatha, Block- Mainpur, District- Gariyaband, (C.G.) 5 - Smt. Anita Manjhi W/o Shri Suna Manjhi Aged About 44 Years Posted As Asst. Teacher (L.B.), At Govt. Primary School Khairmal, Block- Mainpur, District- Gariyaband, (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Mainpur, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 7 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Mainpur, Distt.- Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.08.28 19:18:14 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 28/08/2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in WA No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that 3 the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok