1 2025:CGHC:37982 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1141 of 2017 S. L. Pandey S/o Shri Paras Nath Pandey, Aged About 60 Years R/o Aamapara, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner, Employment And Training, Indrawati Bhawan, Block D, First Floor, P.S. Rakhi, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Pariyajna Prashashak, Ekikrit Aadiwasi Vikas Sakha, Dondi Lohara, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 4 - Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Adhosanrachana Vikas Nigam, Raipur C.G., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Renu Kochar, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer Mr. Prithvi Raj Sahu, on behalf of Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 01.08.2025 2 1. At the very outset, Mr. Vedant Shadangi, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State would submit that the departmental enquiry, which is the subject matter of challenge in the present petition, has already been concluded vide order dated 15.06.2020. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the inquiry was initiated after retirement of the petitioner. In support of her contention, she has placed reliance on the judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench in the matter of Udho Prasad Sharma v. Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. & ors. (2016) (I) MPJR-CG 61. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the departmental inquiry has already been concluded and the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy to prefer a departmental appeal, no case is made out for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM