APHC010594302023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 31148/2023 Between: 1. PAVULURI DURGA BHAVANI, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O.3RD WARD MEMBER, BALLIKURAVA VIIIAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 2. PAVULURI VEERA KUMARI,, W/O.VEERANJANEYULU, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.4TH WARD MEMBER, BAIIIKURAVA VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 3. KANDUKURI RAJESWARI,, W/O.ADHAM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.5TH WARD MEMBER, BALLIKURAVA VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 4. TANGIRALA ANDREYA,, S/O.CHINNA NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.6TH WARD MEMBER, BALLIKURAVA VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 5. KAKKERA ARUNA,, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.7TH W KONDAIAHPALEM VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 6. PULI VEERA NARAYANA,, S/O.SIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.9TH WARD MEMBER, KONDAIAHPALEM VILLAGE, BALLIKURA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 7. BANDARU SUBBA R OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.LOTH WARD MEMBER, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 31148/2023 PAVULURI DURGA BHAVANI, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O.3RD WARD MEMBER, BALLIKURAVA VIIIAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA PAVULURI VEERA KUMARI,, W/O.VEERANJANEYULU, AGED 40 CULTIVATION, R/O.4TH WARD MEMBER, BAIIIKURAVA VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA KANDUKURI RAJESWARI,, W/O.ADHAM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.5TH WARD MEMBER, BALLIKURAVA VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. TANGIRALA ANDREYA,, S/O.CHINNA NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.6TH WARD MEMBER, BALLIKURAVA VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA KAKKERA ARUNA,, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.7TH WARD MEMBER, KONDAIAHPALEM VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA PULI VEERA NARAYANA,, S/O.SIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.9TH WARD MEMBER, KONDAIAHPALEM VILLAGE, BALLIKURA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. BANDARU SUBBA RAO, , S/O.MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.LOTH WARD MEMBER, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI PAVULURI DURGA BHAVANI, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O.3RD WARD MEMBER, BALLIKURAVA VIIIAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA PAVULURI VEERA KUMARI,, W/O.VEERANJANEYULU, AGED 40 CULTIVATION, R/O.4TH WARD MEMBER, BAIIIKURAVA VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA KANDUKURI RAJESWARI,, W/O.ADHAM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.5TH WARD MEMBER, BALLIKURAVA VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. TANGIRALA ANDREYA,, S/O.CHINNA NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.6TH WARD MEMBER, BALLIKURAVA VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA KAKKERA ARUNA,, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 ARD MEMBER, KONDAIAHPALEM VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA PULI VEERA NARAYANA,, S/O.SIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.9TH WARD MEMBER, KONDAIAHPALEM AO, , S/O.MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.LOTH WARD MEMBER, KONDAIAHPALEM VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. PETITIONER/S ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATIA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. 4. THE MANADAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BAILIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM). 5. THE BAILIKURAVA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, BAILIKURAVA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM). 6. P RAMA CHANDRA RAO, S/O.VEERANJANEYULU, R/O.BAILIKURAVA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to Issue an appropriate writ or order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 2nd respondent in not taking action on the petitioner's representation dated 05.10.2023 to set aside or suspend the Resolution dated 28.08.2023 passed by the 5th respondent for construction of side drains for the two roads from the Village Secretariat to Addanki R and B Road and the house of Nagaboina Narasimha Rao to Pavuluri Dhana Rao house without there being any authority of law, as illegal, irregular, irrational and without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also violation of section 246(1) of the Panchayati Raj Act., rules framed there under and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to set aside or suspend the resolution dated 28.08.2023 passed by the 5th respondent gramapanchayat and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 5th respondent not to release the payment of bill amount to the works already completed by the 6th respondent in pursuance of resolution dated 28.08.2023 passed by the 5th respondent gramapanchayat in respect of two side drains works as aforesaid, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2. NAIDU SIVA RAMA KRISHNA 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER Sri Naga Praveen Vankayalapati, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that cause in this writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR