APHC010569652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29550/2025 Between: KALLURI SIVA NAGA BRAHMACHARI, S/O KALLURI SAMBAIAH CHARI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-1-63/8, VALILALA NAGAR, SATTENAPALLI TOWN PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , SATTENAPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SATTENAPALLI POLICE STATION, SATTENAPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. MUTHYAM NAGA MALLESWARI, W/O MUTHYAM SYAMALA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/O PEDAPALAKALURU VILLAGE, GUNTUR CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 and his police personnel in calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening to settle the civil dispute of the 5th respondent, without following the due process of law as illegal, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the 2 Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the police station, without following due process of law.” 2. Sri Kochiri Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that a direction may be given to the Police not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station and not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint lodged by one Regalla Venugopala Rao, the Petitioner was called to the Police Station for enquiry and no case has been registered against the Petitioner. It is further submitted that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to summon the Petitioner to the Police Station without there being any crime registered against him and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:31.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29550 of 2025 Dt.31.10.2025 Dinesh