Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40849 (JHR)

RAM TUDU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7458/2025 · 2025-12-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:38630 --1-- A.B.A. No. 7458 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7458 of 2025 ---- 1. Ram Tudu, aged about 52 years, S/o Late Rapi Tudu 2. Jeta Marandi, aged about 36 years, S/o Marang @ Mangal Marandi 3. Sanjhala Kisku, aged about 40 years, son of Late Jhukal Kisku @ Dakshin Kisku 4. Gudma Murmu @ Gumda Murmu, aged about 36 years, S/o Jalpa Murmu @ Jalda Murmu 5. Ram Marandi, aged about 30 years, S/o Kalichand Marandi 6. Chaube Murmu, aged about 38 years, son of Jadha Murmu 7. Marang Kisku, aged about 46 years, S/o Jhukal Kisku 8. Mangal Marandi, aged about 37 years, S/o Marang Marandi 9. Shiv Tudu @ Shibu Tudu, aged about 26 years, son of Chudka Tudu, All are resident of village – Kolajora, PO – Pakur, PS – Pakur (T), District - Pakur .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Asadul Haque, Advocate :- Md. Faruque Ansari, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Advocate ---- 03/22.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.104 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. 2025:JHHC:38630 --2-- A.B.A. No. 7458 of 2025 No.262 of 2024, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 379 and 34 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Pakur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that false allegation is made against the petitioners of selling of coal after down loading the same from dumper. He further submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.05 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioners of selling of coal. 5. Considering that the allegation is made of selling of coal after taking away the same from dumper and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.05 of the petition and further considering that dumper registration numbers have also been disclosed in the FIR, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Pakur in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.104 of 2025:JHHC:38630 --3-- A.B.A. No. 7458 of 2025 2022 corresponding to G.R. No.262 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 22.12.2025 Sangam/