DEEPAK RATHORE @ GOLU S/O MOHANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
/2661/2025 · 2025-10-10
Sameer Jain
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40848 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40848 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41391] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2661/2025 Deepak Rathore @ Golu S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 15, Jagjeevan Ram Colony Baran, Police Station- Kotwali Baran, District Baran (Raj). (Accused Are Confined At District Jail Baran.) ----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Shri Satyanarayan Meena S/o Shri Chaturbhuj Meena, Rajeev Nagar Tel Factory Baran Kotwali Baran Raj ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhim Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 10/10/2025
1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A(2) SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 487/2025 Police Station Kotwali Baran District Baran for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110 of BNS and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amended 2015).
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant is a street vendor. It is further submitted that on account of some transaction issue qua the quantum of Rs. 10/-, quarrel has occurred inter-se the appellant and the complainant. It
[2025:RJ-JP:41391] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-2661/2025] is submitted that appellant is sole bread earner of the family and is in custody ever since 19.09.2025.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal.
4. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering that appellant is behind bars ever since 19.09.2025; that the appellant is sole bread earner of the family; that the quarrel has occurred inter-se the appellant and the complainant merely on account of a transaction qua Rs. 10 and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the present appeal.
5. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned
order dated 23.09.2025 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Cases, Baran is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Deepak Rathore @ Golu S/o Mohanlal arrested in connection with aforesaid FIR, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /187