APHC010431702021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26180/2021 Between: 1. C.A.GOPAL REDDY, S/O.LATE C.N.ASWARTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. M.CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, PARIGI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETRIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICEDGP, MANGALAGIRI,AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PENUKONDA, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PARIGI POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. C THIMMA REDDY, S/O.LATE C.N.ASWARTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,OCC. ADVOCATE, 7. C MANJUNATH REDDY, S/O. C.THIMMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 8. SRAVAN KUMAR, S/O.C.THIMMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 9. SMT INDIRAMMA, W/O.C.THIMMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 10. C PRABHAKAR REDDY, S/O.LATE C.N.ASWARTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, 11. SMT VASANTHAMMA, W/O.C.PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 12. HARISH, S/O.C.PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 13. GUNASREE, O.C.PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 14. H NARASIMHA MURTHY, S/O.HANURNANTHU@BAJJANNA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, (RESPONDENTS 6 TO 14 R/O. M.CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, PARIGI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.) ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 to 5 to Register the FIR against the Respondents 6 to 14 basing on the written complaint dated 29-09-2021 lodged by the petitioner as well as sent through post and take action as per the procedure by filing final report forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PANUKU RAJESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 in not registering the FIR against the Respondent Nos. 6 to 14 in spite of the petitioner's oral and written complaint dated 29-09-2021 and also inspite of sending the complaint through post and further on several requests and Personal approaches of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, improper, and unconstitutional and against the procedure contemplated under the code of criminal procedure and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to 5 to Register the FIR against the Respondents 6 to 14 basing on the written complaint dated 29-09-2021 lodged by the petitioner and sent through post and take action as per the procedure contemplated under law and to file final report forthwith as per the law and also procedure contemplated under the code of criminal procedure and to pass.” 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that based on the complaint made by the petitioner, police have conducted enquiry and found that allegations leveled against the respondents are false and hence no crime has been registered against the respondents. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.10.2025 RSD 4 111 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26180 of 2021 Dt.30.10.2025 RSD