Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46276-DB WA No. 1246 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 1246 OF 2023 (SCST) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT RENUKAMMA W/O LATE MADAHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
2.
SRI. M ANJUNATH S/O LATE MADAHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
3.
SMT. MAMATHA D/O LATE MADAHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 16, KANTEERAVA COLONY, 13TH E CROSS, AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560079.
…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KARTHIK C, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DISTRICT, VISVESWARAIAH TOWERS, DR. AMBEKDAR VEEDHI,
Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46276-DB WA No. 1246 of 2023
BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, D.C.OFFICE COMPOUND, K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.
3.
SMT. GANGAMMA W/O GOVINDAPPA, AGED MAJOR, C/O SRINIVAS MURTHY FARM GAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-562123.
4.
SMT. SHYLAJA W/O MARIYAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/AT NO. 340, 57TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT NAMITHA MAHESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI. P.B. AJIT, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE PASSED IN WP No. 7707/2021 (SC/ST) DATED 12.07.2023 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46276-DB WA No. 1246 of 2023
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. None appears for the appellants.
2. It is noted that none appeared on behalf of the appellant on the previous date of hearing [05.06.2025] as well.
2. However, this Court had directed the appellants to take steps for service of notice on respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 also remained unserved for want of necessary steps.
3. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
BS - List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16