RUSHIKESH CHANDRAKANT PARIT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
BA/2550/2025 · 2025-09-19
Shri Shivkumar Dige
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40843 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40843 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
21-BA-2550-2025 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2550 OF 2025 Rushikesh Chandrakant Parit …. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. …. Respondents ----- Mr. Santosh Mane for the Applicant. Ms. S. N. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State. Ms. Nikhita Balu Khot, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. -----
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2025.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned APP for the Respondent – State and learned counsel for Respondent No.2.
2.
Learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application.
3.
Learned counsel for the Applicant further submitted that the Applicant is behind bars for more than three years and eight months, yet there is no progress in the trial. Hence, requested liberty be given to the Applicant to file fresh bail application after six months, if trial is not concluded within six months. Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/2 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2025.09.22 18:16:14 +0530
21-BA-2550-2025 (CR).doc
4. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the Applicant, the application is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and disposed off.
5. The Applicant is permitted to file fresh bail application after six months, if trial is not concluded within six months.
( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/2