Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40842 (AP)

KONGARA VENKATESHULU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/32137/2025 · 2025-11-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010619762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32137/2025 Between: 1. KONGARA VENKATESHULU, S/O KONGARA HANUMANTHARAYUDU AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 3-19, MADDIREDDY PALLI, O.C COLONY, KALYANADURGAM, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 2. KONGARA SRINIVASULU,, S/O KONGARA HANUMANTHARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-19 MADDIREDDY PALLI, O.C COLONY, KALYANADURGAM, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 3. KONGARA RAMBABU, S/O KONGARA HANUMANTHARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 3-19, MADDIREDDY PALLI, O.C COLONY, KALYANADURGAM, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM RURAL CIRCLE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE S H O, ANANTHAPURAM RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. VENKATA RAMI REDDY, S/O VENKATA RANUDU, AGED 54 YEARS R/O D.NO. 4-1-849, 6TH ROAD, ANANTAPUR CITY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 herein in interfering with Civil disputes pertaining to property, situated in Plot Nos. 166 and 167 bearing Sy.No.16 admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.4 Cents and Ac.0.52 Cents respectively of Papampeta Village, Anantapur Mandal and Anantapur District, A.P at the behest of the 6th Respondent, without there being any sufficient cause and thereby forcing the Petitioner herein to settle the Civil disputes with Respondent No.6, failing which threatened to lodge false criminal cases, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, besides violating Petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondent Nos.3 to 5 herein not to interfere with the civil disputes existing between the Petitioners and the 6th Respondent” 2. Heard Sri S.V.S.S.Siva Ram, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.11.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32137 of 2025 Dt.20.11.2025 Asr