SRI RAJESWARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/31904/2025 · 2025-11-17
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40830 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40830 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010611972025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 31904 OF 2025 Between:
1. SRI RAJESWARI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, Rep by its Correspondent Sri. Popuri Ramesh Babu D. No. 2/152-E-14-A, SBI Colony, Nandyal Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh- 518501
...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government Department of Higher Education Tulluru, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The National Council for Teacher Education Southern Regional Committee, Rep by its Regional Director G-7, Sector-10, Dwaraka New Delhi-110075. ...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the 2ND Respondent in the show cause notice vide F.No.
SRC / NCTE / SCN / B.Ed / AP / 2019-111168-1174, dated 04.11.2019 and final show cause notice vide F.SRO / NCTE /APS07529 / B.Ed/(AP) / 2020 / 122861-2862, dated 11.01.2021
SRK, J WP No.31904 of 2025
2 and consequential withdrawal order vide No.2021 F.SRO / NCTE / AOS07529 / B.Ed / AP / 2021 / 124752, dated 10.03.2021 withdrawing the recognition of the Petitioner institution, without giving any opportunity to the Petitioner institution as per the procedure contemplated U/s 17 of National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, as being arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and violative of National Council for Teacher Education Act and the Rules famed thereunder and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
SRK, J WP No.31904 of 2025
3 The Court made the following ORDER:
The present Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief.
“……..to issue an appropriate Writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in issuing the show cause notice vide F.No.SRC / NCTE / SCN / B.Ed / AP / 2019-111168-1174, dated 04.11.2019 and final show cause notice vide F.SRO / NCTE / APSO7529 / B.Ed / AP / 2020 / 122861-2862, dated 11.01.2021 and consequential withdrawal order vide No.F.SRO / NCTE / AOS07529 / B.Ed / AP / 2021/124752, dated 10.03.2021 withdrawing the recognition of the petitioner institution, without giving any opportunity to the petitioner institution, as per the procedure contemplated under Section 17 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, as being arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and violative of National Council for Teacher Education Act and the Rules famed thereunder and consequently set aside the same.”
2. Today, when the matter came up for admission, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and acceded to, by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.26846 of 2024 and batch, dated 27.10.2025, wherein this Court held thus. “10. In view of the foregoing discussion, the impugned orders withdrawing the recognition of the petitioners institutions are set aside. SRK, J WP No.31904 of 2025
4 However, it is needless to mention that the respondent-authorities are at liberty to issue letters to the petitioners institutions to obtain information and process the same in accordance with law duly following the provisions of the NCTE Act, 1993. 11. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.”
3. Hence, following the said common order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.26846 of 2024 and batch, dated 27.10.2025 and for the reasons mentioned therein, this Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned order withdrawing the recognition of the petitioner institution is set aside.
However, it is needless to mention that the respondent-authorities are at liberty to issue letters to the petitioner institution to obtain information and process the same in accordance with law duly following the provisions of the NCTE Act, 1993. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:18.11.2025
Note: Office to attach copy of common order in WP No.26846 of 2024 and batch, dated 27.10.2025, to this order. (B/O) Nsr
SRK, J WP No.31904 of 2025
5 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Writ Petition No.31904 of 2025
Date:18.11.2025
Nsr