MANKESH S/O SHRI RAMSAGAR @ SAGARMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12036/2025 · 2025-10-10
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40823 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40823 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41287] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12036/2025
1. Mankesh S/o Shri Ramsagar @ Sagarmal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Nayagaon Thana, Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Tonk)
2. Omprakash S/o Shri Baluram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kumhariya Thana, Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Tonk) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 10/10/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.95/2025 registered at Police Station Banetha, District-Tonk for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 140(3), 110 and 61(2) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that so called the injuries alleged to have been inflicted on the left hand, right leg and right ear of injured Sagar. However, no grievous injury has been caused to any vital part of the injured.
[2025:RJ-JP:41287] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12036/2025] Petitioner is behind the bars since 25.07.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Mankesh S/o Shri Ramsagar @ Sagarmal and Omprakash S/o Shri Baluram shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/71