Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40821 (ALL)

SMT RUBI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/1522/2024 · 2025-08-20

Madan Pal Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144152 Court No. - 91 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1522 of 2024 Revisionist :- Smt Rubi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Mahesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajesh Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Madan Pal Singh,J. 1. Heard Mr. Mahesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the revisionist, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and the learned A.G.A. for the state as well as perused the record. 2. On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present criminal revision has been passed against the order awarding interim maintenance allowance in favour of opposite party no.2 by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, in Case No. 1234 of 2020 (Smt. Gaytri Devi Vs. Smt. Rubi), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station-Prem Nagar, District-Jhansi but now the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court vide judgment and order dated 19th October, 2024 has finally decided the above case no. 1234 of 2020, which has been challenged in another criminal revision being Criminal Revision No. 6233 of 2024, the present criminal revision has become infructuous and therefore, the same be dismissed as infructuous. 3. The learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and the learned A.G.A. for the State could not dispute the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the revisionist. 4. The present criminal revision is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous. (Madan Pal Singh, J.) Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Sushil/- Digitally signed by :- SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad