- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32869 WP No. 5964 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.5964 OF 2021 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SYED NOORUDDIN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O SYED MAGDOOM, SHOP NO.520 AND 525/1, CORPORATION BUILDING, DANVANTHRI ROAD, MYSORE - 570 004. 2. SYED KHAMRUDDIN AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O SYED MAGDOOM, SHOP NO.520, CORPORATION BUILDING, DANAVANTHRI ROAD, MYSORE - 570 004. 3. RASHID AHAMED AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE ABDUL KHUDDUS, SHOP NO.532/2, CORPORATION BUILDING, DANVANTHRI ROAD, MYSORE-570 004. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32869 WP No. 5964 of 2021 4. SAMEER ULLA SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, C/O GHOUSE SHARIFF, SHOP NO.08, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B S NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE MYSURU CITY- MYSURU-570 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R.1; SRI HEMANTH P., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. GEETHA DEVI M.P., ADVOCATE FOR R.2.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICES DATED 18.01.2021 AND 21.01.2021 MADE IN REF.NO.R8[2]PR/255/2020-21 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, COPIES AT ANNEXURES-A TO A3 RESPECTIVELY, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32869 WP No. 5964 of 2021 ORAL ORDER 1. The writ petition is filed, challenging the notices issued by respondent no.2 calling upon the petitioners to vacate their shops. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 upon instructions submits that the shops admittedly belong to respondent No.2 - the Mysuru Mahanagara Palike. However, the notices have been issued erroneously and hence, subsequently, the same have been withdrawn and appropriate proceedings under the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1974 have been initiated to have the petitioners evicted from the property. 3. It is seen that the writ petition pertains to issuance of impugned notices and nothing else. As the same has been withdrawn, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31