KAILASH CHANDRA MUKHERJEE v. M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR
C.Rev./142/2025 · 2025-11-14
Rajesh Shankar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40805 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40805 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:34100-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Civil Review No. 142 of 2025
Kailash Chandra Mukherjee, S/o Late Lakhan Chandra Mukherjee, R/o Village- Nabagram, P.O.-Nildih, P.S.-Raghunathpur, District-Purulia, West Bengal
….. Petitioner
Versus
1. M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Dhanbad
2. Chief Manager (P) MP & R, M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad
3. The General Manager (PF/Pension), M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad
4. The General Manager, M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad
5. The Area Personnel Manager, M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Govindpur Area III, Dhanbad
6. Coal Mines Provident Fund, through its Regional Director, Regional Office D-II, Dhanbad
….. Respondents
-----
CORAM
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Akshay Kr. Mahto, Advocate For the Res. Nos. 1 to 5: Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate For the Res. No. 6: Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, Advocate
-----
02/14.11.2025
I.A. No. 14808 of 2025:
1. For the reasons stated in the application, we find sufficient cause having been carved out which prevented the petitioner from filing the present civil review within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay of 109 days crept up in filing of the present civil review is condoned.
2. The present interlocutory application is, accordingly, disposed of. Civil Review No. 142 of 2025:
3. Heard.
4. We do not find any error apparent on the face of the record.
5. Accordingly, the present civil review is dismissed.
(TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.)
(RAJESH SHANKAR, J) 14th November, 2025 Satish/Vikas/