APHC010493092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25797/2025 Between: 1. B BHANU REDDY, S/O LATE B.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT- 67 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT 155 KAMMAPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYAT, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. B. JYOTHI REDDY, S/O LATE B.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT- 63YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT 155 KAMMAPALLI VILLAGE AND PANCHAYAT, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. B. VENU REDDY, S/O LATE B. GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT- 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT JAYACHANDRA NAGAR, BACK SIDE OF NUTRINE FACTORY, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE THASILDAR, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. E RANGA REDDY, S/O LATE E. CHINNA GARUDA REDDY AGED ABOUT- 73 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT GUTTAKINDAURUVU VILLAGE, 155 KAMMAPALLI POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. T ANANDAMMA, W/O T. RAGHUPATHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT 155 KAMMAPALLI POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the orders in D.Dis.D4/451317/2023, Dt. 19-07-2025 passed 2 by respondent no.2 declaraing the land in an extent of 0.87 cents in survey no. 82/2 of 155 kammapalli village, Yadamari Manadal, Chittoor District, ordering deletion of entries made in favour of petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and Colorable excise of power contrary to the procedure envisaged under the provisions of AP Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Act 1971, and AP Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Rules 1989 and also the well settled principles of legal position apart from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14,19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the orders in D.Dis.D4/451317/2023, Dt. 19-07-2025 passed by the respondent No 2 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the orders in D. Dis.D4/451317/2023, Dt. 19-07-2025 passed by the respondent No 2 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M.S.BANU PRASAD RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.25797 of 2025 ORDER:- Learned counsel for petitioners sought permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on same cause of action. The learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 28.10.2025 KBN