Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40804 (JHR)

KULDEEP KUMAR ALIAS KULDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6380/2025 · 2025-11-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2025:JHHC:33627] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6380 of 2025 Kuldeep Kumar @ Kuldeep Singh, aged about 21 years, Son of Lakhan Singh, Resident of Village Chaitatand, P.O.-Baidmara, P.S.-Harla, District Bokaro, Jharkhand. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 11.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Harla P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024, registered for the offences under Sections 323/325/326/342/379/427/504/506/34 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the suspicion, the FIR has been registered against the petitioner and two other accused persons including other associates. He submits that so far as assault is concerned, it has come in the impugned order that the injury is simple in nature. He next submits that in the FIR, it has been disclosed that the assault was made by sharp cutting weapon, however, in the case diary, it was found to be simple in nature, caused by hard and blunt object. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner was said to be involved in the assault made upon the informant and the guard, causing injuries to them. [ 2025:JHHC:33627] -2- 5. Considering that the petitioner is said to be involved in the assault, however, on the suspicion only, the name of the petitioner has been taken and it has come in the impugned order that in para-74 of the case diary it has come that the injury is simple in nature, caused by hard and blunt object, where in the FIR, it has been found mentioned that the assault has been made by the sharp cutting weapon, I am inclined to provide the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of her surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Bokaro, in connection with Harla P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-11.11.2025 Amitesh/-