280 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18265-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.05.2025 SURJEET ALIAS SURJEET SAINI AND OTHERS …Petitioners V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harkesh Kumar, AAG Haryana. Mr. Pankaj Attri, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No. 0108 dated 26.02.2025 registered under Sections 109(1)/115/127(2)/3(5)/351(3) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 registered at Police Station Sirsa City District Sirsa (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. Learned State counsel, at the outset submits that present petition is not maintainable as one of the injured witness i.e. Parveen, who was duly named in the FIR and also suffered injuries, has not been impleaded as necessary party in the present petition and partial compromise is not permissible in terms of reference answered by the Division Bench of this Court in CRM-M-48043-2023 decided on 12.11.2024 titled as ‘Rakesh Das Vs. State of Haryana and Another’. AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.05.06 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-18265-2025 (O&M) -2- 3. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition after impleading all the stake holders. 4. In view of the above, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) 05.05.2025 JUDGE Ajay Goswami Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.05.06 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document