Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40798 (AP)

KANDISA SHANTHAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1834/2022 · 2025-10-29

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010026672022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1834/2022 Between: 1. KANDISA SHANTHAMMA, W/O KANAKA RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS OCC. HOUSE WIFE, ARASADA VILLAGE VANGARAMANDAL SRIKAKULAMDISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDIAMARAVATI GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAMSRIKAKULAMDISTRICT A P 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKONDASRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANGARA POLICE STATION SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VANGARA POLICE STATION SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 6. THE TAHSILDAR, VANGARAMANDAL SRIKAKULAMDISTRICT 7. LATCHUBHUKTASATYAMNARAYANA, S/O APPALANAIDU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC.SARPANCH, ARASADA VILLAGE VANGARAMANDAL SRIKAKULAMDISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. MOJJADA HARI KRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of 2 Respondents No. 4 and 5 authority persons in trying to demolish the petitioner chicken shop at Main Road Arasada village Vangara Mandal Srikakulam District with collusion of the Respondents No.6 and 7 without conducting proper enquiry and without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Art.14, 21 and (300) (A) Of Constitution of India and also violation of the principles of natural Justice. Consequently direct the Respondent No.4 and 5 authority persons not to interfere to demolish the petitioner chicken shop at Main Road Arasada village Vangara Mandal Srikakulam District and pass.” 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the subject matter is civil in nature, no crime has been registered against the petitioner and the police are not interfering in the civil disputes. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.10.2025 RSD 3 102 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1834 of 2022 Dt.30.10.2025 RSD