Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40797 (RAJ)

JANAK SINGH SON OF NAWAB SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7281/2025 · 2025-08-13

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32621] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7281/2025 Janak Singh Son of Nawab Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Bijalpura Police Station Sone Ka Gurja District Dholpur Rajasthan (At Present Petitioner is Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav Ms. Preeti Kumari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the petitioner-accused Janak Singh Son of Nawab Singh in FIR No.221/2020 dated 26.10.2020 registered at P.S. Bari Sadar District - Dholpur, whereby the petitioner-accused has charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 307, 400, 216-A of IPC and Sections 3 & 25 of Arms Act, 1959 (Amended, 2019) and Section 11 of the Rajasthan Dacoity Effected Area Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that this petitioner is neither named in FIR nor identified by anyone. He further submits that after firing [2025:RJ-JP:32621] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-7281/2025] by Keshav Dacoit, the police has searched certain CCTVs and on basis of CCTV, this petitioner was arrested by police. He further submits that all other persons were granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court and present petitioner is in custody since 03.05.2025. He further assures that in case, the petitioner-accused is required for further investigation, the petitioner-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner-accused in custody. 3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and he submitted a report received from PS Badi Sadar, District Dholpur along with criminal antecedents to show that three cases were registered against this petitioner-accused. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 5. The record suggest that accused Kamlesh wife of Shri Mukesh granted bail on 16.12.2020, accused Bhura Singh granted bail on 30.01.2021, accused Aafisar @ Afsar, Rekhsingh, Ranjeet and Gangaram granted bail on 18.02.2021, accused Narayan Singh granted bail on 19.03.2021, Naresh son of Ramdal granted bail on 18.06.2021, Omveer @ Laden granted granted bail on 18.09.2021, Shivram granted bail on 03.11.2022, Ramavtar @ Banti granted bail on 16.01.2023 and Devendra @ Deva [2025:RJ-JP:32621] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-7281/2025] granted bail on 24.01.2025 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 6. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the petitioner-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner-accused. 7. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of petitioner- accused is hereby allowed and the petitioner-accused Janak Singh Son of Nawab Singh is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The petitioner-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The petitioner-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. [2025:RJ-JP:32621] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-7281/2025] 8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/35