SS,J Crl.R.C.Nos.2103&1321 of 2016 APHC010103962016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2103/2016 Between: 1. M.SANJAY SRI @ DIVYA, CHITTOOR.,, W/O. M. HARI BABU, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 20-5-71, SANJAY GANDHI COLONY, KORLAGUNTA, . TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT PRESENTLY R/O. D.NO. 19-83, THANAPPA CHETTY STREET, MITTOOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M HARI BABU CHITTOOR AND ANR REP PP, S/O. M. VENKATARAMANA, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO. 20-5-71, SANJAY GANDHI COLONY, KORLAGUNTA, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SATISH SANDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) SS,J Crl.R.C.Nos.2103&1321 of 2016 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1321/2016 Between: 1. M.HARI BABU, CHITTOOR DT.,, S/0 M.Venkataramana, Aged about 30yrs, R/o D.No.20-5-71, Sanjay Gandhi Colony, Korlagunta, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. M SANJAY SRI DIVYA CHITTOOR ANR REP PP, W/O M.Hari Babu, Aged about 25yrs, R/o D.No.20-5-71, Sanjay Gandhi Colony, Korlagunta, Tirupati, Presently R/o D.No.19-83, Thanappa Chetty Street, Mittoor, Chittoor. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner: D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:SATISH SANDU SS,J Crl.R.C.Nos.2103&1321 of 2016 The Court made the following COMMON ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the parties submit before this Court that the dispute between the parties has been settled outside the Court and learned counsels further submit that the instant criminal revision petition has became infructuous as the purpose has been settled. 2. After noting the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and also considering the fact that the dispute has been settled outside the Court, there is nothing left for this Court to decide. 3. Accordingly, the instant criminal revision cases are disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date: 06.11.2025 Dvs SS,J Crl.R.C.Nos.2103&1321 of 2016 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA 28 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 2103 & 1321 of 2016 Date:06.11.2025 Dvs