APHC010612112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 31845/2025 Between: Env Satyanarayana ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: -2- W.P. No.31845 OF 2025 Date of order:18.11.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.31845 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents for non-payment of the bills for the works undertaken by the petitioner. 2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning, and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent- Municipal Corporation. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4th respondent entrusted the work to the petitioner i.e., providing GI sheet roof shed and vitrified tiles flooring in top floor of Ambedkar Bhavan, under agreement NO.EE-249/2018-19, dt.13.11.2018. 4. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner duly executed the work to the satisfaction of the 4th respondent. It is further submitted that after execution of the work, the progress of the work was recorded in M book. Later, the petitioner submitted final bill. The authorities of the 4th respondent, after the quality check and after fulfilling statutory requirements, approved the final bill, however the part of the bill an amount of Rs.8,96,157/- -3- W.P. No.31845 OF 2025 Date of order:18.11.2025 was withheld in the year 2022, so far the said amount has not been released. 5. The learned standing counsel for the 2nd respondent, on oral instructions, submits that the works undertaken by the petitioner was completed to the satisfaction of the authorities of the 2nd respondent. However, on account of lack of funds, the balance payment could not be made to the petitioner till now and that payment would be made shortly. 6. Considering the submissions that the work completed by the petitioner is not in dispute, there shall be a direction to respondents 4 and 8 to verify and release the payments due payable to the petitioner within a period of six weeks. 7. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 8. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N BV