Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4078 (JHR)

RAJENDRA KUMAR ALIAS RAJENDRA MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./580/2025 · 2025-01-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 580 of 2025 ------ Rajendra Kumar @ Rajendra Mahto, aged about 24 years, son of Uma Mahto @ Umar Mahto, resident of village Salaiya, P.O. Barwan, P.S. Barkatha, District –Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahadeo Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 28.01.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Barkatha P.S. Case No.200 of 2023 registered under sections 341/323/ 354/354B/354D/385/504/506/34/509 of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons has been harassing and blackmailing the informant by adding her in their group on a social media without her consent and wanted to take the informant to Delhi and threatened her that if she will not come, they will put her dirty pictures on social media and make the same viral and also took Rs.2,000/- from her. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no allegation against the petitioner of using any criminal force to disrobe the victim. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.5,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Hazaribagh, in connection with Barkatha P.S. Case No.200 of 2023 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-