Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40774 (ALL)

SATISH CHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/11151/2025 · 2025-04-15

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:55854 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11151 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satish Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sachin Mishra Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri Sachin Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents no.2 & 3. 2. The recovery notice dated 06.09.2024 issued by the respondent no.2 is under challenge in the present writ petition. 3. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that by the impugned show cause notice petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.6,81,839/- along with interest. It is further argued by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready and willing to make the payment if proper opportunity is provided to him before taking any action in this regard. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, present writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit a reply to the aforesaid notice with the respondent-Bank along-with bank draft of Rs.50,000/- within two weeks from today. If it is so the respondent-bank is directed to consider the reply and take a decision in the matter strictly in accordance with law within further period of four weeks. 7. For a period of six weeks or till the decision is taken by the respondent-bank, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Pramod Tripathi Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad