Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4077 (UTT)

SEEMA MISHRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/510/2020 · 2025-06-05

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.510 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Navneet Chaudhary, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, Advocate for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners made a statement that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners and that charge sheet has now been challenged in a proceeding under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. before this Court. 5. In view of the statement made by counsel for the parties nothing survives in the writ petition. 6. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 05.06.2025 SK