Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40755 (KAR)

SUKANRAJ S JAIN v. SMT SHYLASHREE KALABURGI RAGHAVENDRA

COMAP/399/2024 · 2025-10-25

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 399 OF 2024 BETWEEN SUKANRAJ S. JAIN, S/O LATE SAREMAL JI JAIN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.21, LAXMI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR, SERPENTINE ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE – 560 020, REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER, SRI SIDDANTH S. ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri/Smt.: B. L. NANDA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SMT. SHYLASHREE KALABURGI RAGHAVENDRA, W/O LATE RAGHAVENDRA N., AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, …2 COMAP NO.399/2024 2 NO.103, 7TH CROSS, LOWER PALACE ORCHARD, BANGALORE – 560 003. 2 . COSMOZONE CLOTHING PRIVATE LIMITED, R/O NO.8/1, GANDHI LAYOUT, AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 079, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR/AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SMT. SHYLASHREE KALABURGI - RAGHAVENDRA. 3 . SRI KALABURGI NANJUDASA MANJUNATH S/O SRI NANJUNDASA H., AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO.240/1, 3RD MAIN ROAD, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BANGALORE NORTH – 560 086. …RESPONDENT/S The Advocate for the appellant has filed the above COMAP / Commercial Appeal under order 43 rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure Praying that this Honble Court may be pleased to …3 COMAP NO.399/2024 3 a) Call for the entire records in Com. Mis. 29/2023 dated 27/8/2024 passed by CCH-84 City Civil and Sessions Judge of Commercial Court. b) Allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the Learned Judge in Com. Mis. 29/2023 and confirm the judgment and decree passed in Com. O.S. 681/2021 dated 21/4/2022 in the interest of justice. This Commercial Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following order. ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) There is no representation for the appellant. The matter is listed fourth time for non-compliance of office objections. Finally, two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand rejected without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE …4 COMAP NO.399/2024 4 NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 25.10.2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is hereby rejected. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS Ty dt : 11.12.2025 C.dt : 17.12.2025