[2025:RJ-JP:50227] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19288/2025 1. Radha Rani Kirad D/o Shri Ramavtar Kirad, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 9, Julahpada, Bhusawad, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 2. Kritika Rajan D/o K. Rajan, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of 1-P-29, Talwandi, Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Secretariat Jaipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Dausa. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Bundi. 4. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Mahuwa, District Dausa. 5. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Keshoraypatan, District Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Gouttam Mr. G.S. Gouttam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxena for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners with following prayer:- It is therefore, most humbly prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and call for and examine entire record of the case and by an appropriate writ, order and direction: [2025:RJ-JP:50227] (2 of 3) [CW-19288/2025] i) The Hon'ble Court may kindly be declare the illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action of the respondents by which the respondents are not granting the notional and other service benefits to the petitioners from the year 2013 while the other similar nature persons have already granted the notional and other service benefits from the year 2013 under LDC recruitment, 2013; ii) That the respondent may kindly be directed to be given the notional and other service benefits to the petitioners from the year 2013 under the LDC recruitment 2013 wherefrom the other candidates accorded appointment under said recruitment. iii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioners. 2. Considered submission of learned counsel for petitioners, issue notice to respondents. 3. Mr. Prateek Saxena on behalf of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. 4. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG as counsel for respondents. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to serve a copy of petition to learned counsel for respondents. 6. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the order dated 08.08.2025 in SB CWP No.11564/2024 titled as Premchand Mehar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court and Nand Kishore and Ors. Vs. State of [2025:RJ-JP:50227] (3 of 3) [CW-19288/2025] Rajasthan and Ors.:- S.B. CWP No.12109/2018, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition in following terms: (1) The petitioners are at liberty to file representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. (2) The respondents shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt taking into consideration the order/judment of this Court dated 18.07.2018 passed in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra) with communication of the decision to them. (3) If the petitioners are found eligible and entitled for grant of notional and other service benefits as paid to the similarly situated employees, the compliance shall be made within a period of 8 weeks from the date of taking the decision. 7. Instant writ petition, misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /98