Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40752 (PAT)

Kapileshwar Yadav @ Kapo Yadav v. The State of Bihar

MJC/1329/2023 · 2025-08-01

Mohit Kumar Shah

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1329 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7156 of 2021 ====================================================== Kapileshwar Yadav @ Kapo Yadav Son of Shibu Yadav Resident of Village- Mangang Pashchim PS-Jadiya, Anchal Triveniganj, District-Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Mr. Arvind Kumar, the Principal Secretary Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. Mr. Avnish Kumar, the District Magistrate, Supaul. 4. Mr. Shambhu Nath, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Triveniganj, District-Supaul. 5. Mr. Dinesh Kumar, the Circle Officer, Triveniganj, District-Supaul. 6. Mr. Rajesh Chaudhary, the Officer-in Charge, Police Station, Jadiya, District-Supaul. 7. Ganeshi Yadav S/o Late Lelhai Yadav Resident of Manganj West ward no.2, P.O-Manganj, P.S.-Jadiya, District-Supaul. 8. Mr. Subhash Yadav Son of Late Rami Yadav Resident of Manganj West, ward no.2, P.O.-Manganj, P.S.-Jadiya, District-Supaul. 9. Khattar Yadav S/o Late Parmeshwari Yadav Resident of Manganj West, ward no.2, P.O.-Manganj, P.S.-Jadiya, District-Supaul. 10. Sajjan Yadav S/o Late Parmeshwari Yadav Resident of Manganj West, ward no.2, P.O.-Manganj, P.S.-Jadiya, District-Supaul. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anjani Kumar (AAG- 4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 5 01-08-2025 1. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged encroacher has preferred a writ, bearing C.W.J.C. No.6440 of 2021, with regard to the subject matter of the present proceeding, hence it would be advisable for the petitioner to intervene in the said writ proceedings. Patna High Court MJC No.1329 of 2023(5) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 2. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner is already a party in the aforesaid writ petition, the present petition be disposed off. 3. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed off. sonal/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) U