- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28955-DB CCC No. 774 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 774 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI. MUJAHID VEER SINGH RATHOD S/O LATE MOHAMMED YUSUFF RATHOD AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT. No.170, PRESTIGE O ZONE WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD BEHIND FORUM MALL WHITEFIELD BENGALURU-560 077 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. MUNI REDDY M.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY DEPT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001 …PROFORMA RESPONDENT 2. SRI. ARUL KUMAR THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPRUA SUB DIVISION TUBAGERE-DODDABALLAPURA RD DODDABALLAPURA-561 203 Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28955-DB CCC No. 774 of 2022 3. SRI. MANJUNATH K. THE TAHSILDAR NELAMANGALA TALUK NELAMANGALA-562 123 …ACCUSED (BY SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO (a) INITIATE APPROPRIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE RESPONDENT FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 19.01.2022 IN WP No.23490/2021 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING THE ORDERS OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AS PER ANNEXURE-'A'. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the complainant and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for accused Nos.1 to 3. 2. It is submitted by the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State that orders have been issued for compliance of directions contained in the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28955-DB CCC No. 774 of 2022 judgment and the copy of the orders are made available along with the memo. 3. The memo is taken on record. 4. Accordingly, the contempt of court case is disposed of recording that the orders have already been issued. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50