Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4075 (GAU)

Bharat Teng v. The State of AP and 4 Ors

WP(C)/31/2024 · 2025-02-03

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040000872024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/31/2024 Bharat Teng S/o Late Dudum Teng, permanent resident of Gette Village, PO Yingkiong, Upper Siang District, AP VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Ors represented by the Commissioner (Education), Govt of AP, Itanagar 2:The Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Education Govt of AP Itanagar 3:The Director of Elementary Education Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of AP Itanagar 4:The Deputy Dirctor of School Education Age: 0 Occupation : Upper Siang District Yingkiong AP 5:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Upper Siang District Page No.# 2/2 Yingkiong A Advocate for the Petitioner : Dicky Panging, Rosy c Lowangcha,Kirmar Ado,Marge D,D Tamuk Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Education),Taba Tagum BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : 04-02-2025 Heard Mr. M. Doji, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Pangu, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner has informed this Court that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. He accordingly, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition. The aforesaid prayer has not been opposed by the learned State counsel. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant