Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40742 (AP)

B. HEMALATHA v. SRIDHAR CHAMAKURI, IAS

CC/1587/2025 · 2025-12-03

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010321472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1587/2025 Between: 1. B. HEMALATHA, W/O B. NAGARAJA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.1-39, NAKKALADINNE, PONNUTAPALEM VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE TOWN MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRIDHAR CHAMAKURI IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT (R3) 2. DHANUNJAYALU, THE TAHSILDAR, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT (R4) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the respondents under Sec.10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon’ble High Court dated 30.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.9141 of 2021. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the order dated 30.01.2025 in W.P.No.9141 of 2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 30.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.9141 of 2021. 2. Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with. As such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J Date: 04.12.2025 KSN/RMR 261 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE No.1587 of 2025 Date: 04.12.2025 KSN/RMR