2025:JHHC:32957 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5921 of 2025 ------ Shyamal Kuamr Goswami, son of late Uma Charan Goswami, resident of village Gopinathpur, P.o and P.S. Pathuria, District Bokaro, Jharkhand. .… Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Jharkhand, Second Floor, FFP Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. The Director, Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Jharkhand, Second Floor, FFP Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. The District Panchayati Raj Officer, District Collectorate Building, P.O Camp-II, P.S. Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro, Jharkhand. 5. The Deputy Commissioner, District Collectorate Building, P.O Camp-II, P.S. Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro, Jharkhand. 6. Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Jaridih, P.O Bandhdih, P.S. Jaridih, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. 7. The Block Development Officer, Jaridih, P.O Bandhdih, P.S. Jaridih, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand. 8. Mr. Hakim Kumar Mahato, present Mukhiya Bandhdih, Sourth, P.O Bandhdih Branch, P.S. Jaridih, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. 9. Mr. Abdus Salam, Former Panchayat Sachiv Bandhdih South, P.O Bandhdih Branch, P.S. Jaridih, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. 10.Mr. Kameshwar Mahto, present Panchayat Sachiv, Bandhdih South, P.O Bandhdih Branch, P.S. Jaridih, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. ...Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s): M/s Ashish Kumar Verma and Priti Kumari, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Faisal Allam, AC to SC Mines-III ------ 03/03.11.2025: Heard the parties. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that in the Gram Sabha meeting, the name of some of the persons to be appointed as Panchayat Sahayak was considered but this petitioner has been left out. It is also submitted that the meeting, which was allegedly held was improper as the Coram was not complete, which would be evident from the photograph taken during the said meeting. He submits that minutes of the meeting, which has been prepared is a paper work and some persons who were not present were made to sign the minutes. He further submits that the signatures appear therein are forged. 3 After considering the submission of the petitioner, I find that this Court cannot decide the grievance of the petitioner as the same is absolutely factual in nature. 4 Thus, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation along with evidence, which is in possession of the petitioner, within six weeks from today, before the Block Development Officer, Jaridih, Bokaro, who will consider the grievance of the petitioner after making proper enquiry and pass appropriate order pursuant to his enquiry within a period of ten weeks thereafter. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. 03rd November, 2025 Anu/-Cp2. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 2.