MD TASLEEM KHAN ALIAS TASLIM KHAN v. THE STATE OFJHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./704/2025 · 2025-08-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4074 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4074 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:24979 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.704 of 2025
------ Md. Tasleem Khan @ Taslim Khan S/o Sri Kamaruddin, aged about 66 years, R/o Makhdhumpur, P.O. and P.S. Balidih & District- Bokaro.
… Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Tarannum Bano W/o Sartaz Alam @ Aslam resident of Sector 4, Near Masjid, P.O. and P.S.-Sector 4, District-Bokaro.
… Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Chaitali Chatterjee Sinha, Advocate For the State
: Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-22-08-2025
Heard the parties.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2726 of 2019 to its original file; which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory
order dated 14.11.2024.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.2726 of 2019 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 14.11.2024 for filing requisites for service of notice upon the opposite party no.2 peremptorily within two weeks. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the learned counsel for the petitioner did not note that there was a peremptory order to issue notices for which the petitioner could not file the said requisites within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.2726 of 2019 for non-compliance vide
order dated 14.11.2024. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said order dated 14.11.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2726 of 2019 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.2726 of 2019 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No.2726 of 2019 is directed to be restored to its original file to the same stage, at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.2726 of 2019 before the concerned Bench after a week.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/