APHC010628342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32618/2025 Between: 1. CHEBROLU ISSACK ALIAS IJACK,, S/O ABRAHAM, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1/203-P39, POOLA SUBBAIAH COLONY, MARKAPURA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523316 2. NALLURI PRABHAKAR,, S/O YELLAIAH,AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.7-16-156/18, GIDDALURTOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. BOVVURI KRISHNAVENI,, W/O BALA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 10-204, SVKP COLLEGE ROAD, MARKAPURTOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. NISINAM CHENNA KESHAVULU,, S/O CHENNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-203-A-142, S.C. B.C. COLONY, MARKAPURTOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. NISINAM BALA VEERAIAH,, S/O SOMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 1/203-A-115, S.C. B.C. COLONY, . MARKAPURTOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. ADIMULAPU BHASKAR,, S/O BENJIMAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O POOLA SUBBAIAH COLONY, S.C. B.C. COLONY, MARKAPURTOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. DARIVEMULA ABRAHAM @ RAVIKUMAR,, S/O ABINIZER, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O ABM PALEM, MARKAPURTOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. NISINAM DEVAIAIH,, S/O CHENNAIAH.AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/O H.NO.1/203-A-8-1, SCBC COLONY, S.C. B.C. COLONY, MARKAPURTOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 9. MUKKIRAPU SAROJAMMA,, W/O BABURAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O SC PALEM, NAGULAVARAM VILLAGE, TARLUPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRI. SECRETRAY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A.P. SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, LAW AND ORDER, MARKAPUR P.S. PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. PERUMALLA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O VEERAIAH, AGED 56YEARS R/O D.NO. 732, PERAM BAZAR, 7TH WARD, MARKAPUR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 5. NUKALA MURALI KRISHNA, S/O CHENEHAIAH, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO. 305, AKRUTI NIVAS, D.NO. 721764 AND 1765 CZECH COLONY, SANATH NAGR, HADERABAD. 6. TALLAPALLY PRASAD, S/O ADINARAYANAM, AGED 56YEARS, R/O 7TH WARD, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 7. V V S MALLIKARJUNA RAO, S/O SUBRAMANYAM, R/O MARKAPURTOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. NAGABHAIRAVA MEDHINI DEVI, W/O RAVINDRANATH TAGORE AGED 76YEARS, R/O FLAT NO. 303, KK MIGHTS APARTMENT, D.NO. 1053/4, MASABTANK, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA 9. KODALI VIDULLATHA, , W/O RAMAKRISHNA AGED 53YEARS, R/O FLAT NO. 303, KK MIGHTS APARTMENT, D.NO. 1053/4 MASABTANK, HYDERABAD,TELANGANA. 10. VELIGANDIA SAI POORNA, W/O VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 50YEARS, D/NO. 40, MAGADHA VILLAGE, CBIT GANDIPET ROAD KOKAPET, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K LAXMANA SASTRY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. SRINIVASULU KURRA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 are not taking any action against the respondents No. 4 to 10 is wholly arbitrary and unlawful manner in utter violation of the principles of natural justice, and violation of Sec 4 and 5 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989) without issuing any notice as arbitrary, illegal and unjust and issue consequential direction directing the respondents no. 1 to 3 to protect the petitioners and to expedite the complaint of the petitioners dated 03-11-2025, also and not to 3 interfere in the petitioners land in Sy.Nos. 1475 to 1483 of Markapur Village, Prakasam District.” 2. Sri K.Lakshmana Sastry, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Police have not registered any crime based on the complaint given by the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint of the Petitioner, because of the frequent disputes between both the groups, Police arranged picket in the subject land to avoid further disputes between them. It is further submitted that the Police have not registered any case, since the subject matter is purely civil in nature. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:03.12.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32618 of 2025 Dt.03.12.2025 Dinesh