Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40733 (RAJ)

DR. HONEY AGARWAL D/O DR. PRADEEP KUMAR AGARWAL v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/549/2025 · 2025-01-16

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 549/2025 Dr. Honey Agarwal D/o Dr. Pradeep Kumar Agarwal, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Flat No. 304, Saraswat Akshita Apartment, D-282, Meera Marg, Banipark, Jaipur (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Its Director General Of Health Services, Medical Counseling Committee, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Neet Pg Admission/counseling Board-2024, Through Its Chairman, Sms Medical College, Jaipur (Raj). 4. Medical Counseling Committee, Through Its Secretary, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110108 5. National Board Of Examination, Through Its Registrar, Mahatma Gandhi Marg (Ring Road, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG with Mr. Yash Joshi Ms. Disha Jain for Ms. Manjeet Kaur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/01/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation within a period of seven days in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular (2 of 2) [CW-549/2025] issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). 2. Heard. 3. This Court directs Respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same, within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular dated 19.02.2024. 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /437