Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40732 (RAJ)

KUNVAR SINGH S/O BABU v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2166/2025 · 2025-04-21

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16613] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2166/2025 Kunvar Singh S/o Babu, Aged 61 Years, R/o Sunhera, P.S. Kaman, Distt. Deeg (Raj). ----Petitioner/Complainant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Inspector General Of Police, Bharatpur Range Bharatpur (Raj). 4. Superintendent Of Police, District Deeg (Raj). 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Kaman, Deeg, District Deeg (Raj). ----Respondents No.1 to 5 6. Lokesh (Head Constable) S/o Unknown, The Then Posted Police Station Kaman At Present Posted At Civil Line Deeg (Raj). ----Respondent No.6/Accused For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Surbhi Khandelwal for Mr. D.D. Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 21/04/2025 1. By way of the present petition, fair investigation is asked for in furtherance to F.I.R. No.49/2025 was registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg dated 29.01.2025 for the offences under Sections 308(2), 308(7), 316(2) of BNS. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the investigation is [2025:RJ-JP:16613] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2166/2025] either stagnant of the Investigating Officer is not investigating the matter in a fair, proper and legal manner. 2. In light of the foregoing facts and circumstances of the matter and as per the directions encapsulated in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409], it is directed that the concerned Superintendent of Police (respondent no. 4) shall grant audience to the petitioner, who shall mark presence before the said authority, at 11:00 AM on 30.04.2025 in his office. Concerned Superintendent of Police is directed to consider the representation so filed by the petitioner in a holistic manner, and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/60