[2025:RJ-JP:41489] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15501/2025 Smt. Shanti Sharma Wife Of Late Shri Brahmashankar Ji Sharma, Aged About 86 Years, R/o Plot No. 854, Ramnagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Meena Sharma Wife Of Late Shri Inder Kumar Sharma, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Plot No. 854, Ramnagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Siddarath Sharma S/o Late Shri Inder Kumar Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Plot No. 854, Ramnagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. Kanishka Sharma D/o Late Shri Inder Kumar Sharma, Aged About 17 Years, Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Meena Sharma, R/o Plot No. 854, Ramnagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 4. Narendra Solanki S/o Shri Unknown, Age Major, R/o Plot No. 296, Rani Sati Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 10/10/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.7, Jaipur Metropolitan-I to decide the civil suit No.84/2019 expeditiously. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a widow lady and a senior citizen having age of 86 years and the case is pending before the learned Trial Court for its [2025:RJ-JP:41489] (2 of 2) [CW-15501/2025] adjudication since 2019 and six years have passed, so appropriate directions be issued to the learned Trial Court to decide the said suit in time bound manner. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 4. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi vs. State of Maharashtra1 while relying on the constitutional Bench judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of U.P.2, has deprecated the practice of the Courts of issuing directions to the subordinate Courts to decide the matter in a timeline. 5. The aforesaid directions, as prayed for, cannot be issued by this Court. But looking at the fact that the petitioner is a widow lady and a senior citizen having the age of 86 years; the case is pending before the learned Trial Court for its adjudication since 2019; evidence of the petitioner is concluded on 07.03.2024. Therefore, it is expected from the learned Trial Court to make all possible endeavours to decide the suit expeditiously while ensuring that no unnecessary and unreasonable requests for adjournment is entertained. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. 7. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /32 1 2024 SCC Online SC 3526 2 2024 INSC 150