APHC010968102018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3519 OF 2018 Between: 1. INDUGULA RAMANJANEYULU, S/O. KONDANDARAMAIAH, AGE 32 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.7-290, SHANTINAGAR, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. INDUGULA MUTHYALLAM, W/O. KONDANDARAMAIAH, AGE 67 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.7-290, SHANTINAGAR, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. INDUGULA KODANDA RAMAIAH, S/O. SURAIAH, AGE 78 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.7-290, SHANTINAGAR, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. INDUGULA RAMARAO, S/O. KONDANDARAMAIAH, AGE 28 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.7-290, SHANTINAGAR, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD. 2. INDUGULA MAHESWARI, W/O. RAMANJANEYULU, R/O. NCC COLONY, 9TH STREET, PODALAKURU ROAD, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to being aggrieved by the order dated 2 30/11/2018 in CrI.MP.No.540 of 2017 in C.C.No.659 of 2016 of the Judicial Magistrate of I-Class, Special Mobile Court at Nellore, herein filed this revision petition upon the following amongst other grounds. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.659 of 2016 in the court of Judicial Magistrate of I-Class, Special Mobile Court, Nellore, Nellore District, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. JAYASEKHAR PILLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioners/accused under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 30.11.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.540 of 2017 in C.C.No.659 of 2016 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court at Nellore (for short, ‘the trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, the Crl.M.P.No.540 of 2017 has been filed by the petitioners/accused under Section 239 of Cr.P.C. seeking to discharge the petitioners/accused from the case. By impugned order dated 30.11.2018, the learned trial Court dismissed the petition by recording certain reasons. Against the said order, the petitioners/accused preferred the present revision. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the main C.C.No.659 of 2016 was disposed on 12.11.2022. In support of this, a copy from the 3 e-Courts website has been filed, which reflects that the said C.C.No.659 of 2016 was disposed on 12.11.2022 and it was settled before the Lok Adalat. 5. Recording the said submission of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the disposal of the C.C.No.659 of 2016 on 12.11.2022 as it was settled before the Lok Adalat, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 23.12.2025 MS 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3519 of 2018 Date: 23.12.2025 MS