APHC010551532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 28613/2025 Between: 1. PULI JAYAMMA, , AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O.PULI SUBBARAYUDU RFO-H-NO.3 8/247-6-7 (HOUSE IN MANGO GARDEN) RAMANJANEYAPURAM, CHINNACHOWK, KADAPA CITY YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. PULI VANAJA,, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS W/O. P.NAGA RAJU, R/O.H.NO.3 8/247-6-7 (HOUSE IN MANGO GARDEN) RAMANJANEYAPURAM, CHINNACHOWK, KADAPA CITY YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA DIVISION YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, KADAPA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 6. THE GENERAL MANAGER, A.P.RAJEEV SWAGRUHA CORPORATION LTD., SANKARAPURAM, KADAPA CITY,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondent no.2 and 3 in not disposing of File No. REV-DSECOROR(AD)/ 110 /2025-SA-D2- KANDB-KDPCO within a reasonable period of time, pertains to the petitioners lands in Sy.no. 1001/2 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 Cents and Sy.no. 1001/4 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chinnachowk Village, Ramanjaneyapuram, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and also further the respondents are trying to interfering with the petitioners possession and enjoyment of the lands in Sy.no. 1001/2 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 Cents and Sy.no.1001/4 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chinnachowk Village, Ramanjaneyapuram, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District by cutting down mango trees aged 27 years of 80 trees without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary. Violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-A Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent no.2 and 3 to dispose of the File No. REV-DSECOROR(AD)/ 110 /2025-SA-D2-KANDB- KDPCO within a reasonable period of time, pertains to the petitioners lands in Sy.no. 1001/2 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 Cents and Sy.no.1001/4 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chinnachowk Village, Ramanjaneyapuram, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and also further direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners possession and enjoyment of the lands in Sy.no.1001/2 to an extent of Ac.1.50 cents and Sy.no.1001/4 to an extent of Ac.1.50 cents situated at Chinnachowk Village, Ramanjaneyapuram, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District including not to cut stand mango trees of aged 27 years of 80 trees of the petitioners lands and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners possession and enjoyment of the lands in Sy.no.1001/2 to an extent of Ac.1.50 cents and Sy.no.1001/4 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chinnachowk Village, Ramanjaneyapuram, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District including not to cut stand mango trees of aged 27 years of 80 trees of the petitioners lands pending disposal of main Writ petition and pas Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AMANCHI ROYAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.28613 of 2025 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondent no.2 and 3 in not disposing of File No. REV-DSECOROR(AD)/ 110 /2025-SA-D2-KANDB-KDPCO within a reasonable period of time, pertains to the petitioners lands in Sy.no. 1001/2 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 Cents and Sy.no. 1001/4 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chinnachowk Village, Ramanjaneyapuram, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and also further the respondents are trying to interfering with the petitioners possession and enjoyment of the lands in Sy.no. 1001/2 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 Cents and Sy.no.1001/4 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chinnachowk Village, Ramanjaneyapuram, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District by cutting down mango trees aged 27 years of 80 trees without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary. Violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-A Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent no.2 and 3 to dispose of the File No. REV- DSECOROR(AD)/ 110 /2025-SA-D2-KANDB- KDPCO within a reasonable period of time, pertains to the petitioners lands in Sy.no. 1001/2 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 Cents and Sy.no.1001/4 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chinnachowk Village, Ramanjaneyapuram, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and also further direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners possession and enjoyment of the lands in Sy.no.1001/2 to an extent of Ac.1.50 cents and Sy.no.1001/4 to an extent of Ac.1.50 cents situated at Chinnachowk Village, Ramanjaneyapuram, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District including not to cut stand mango trees of aged 27 years of 80 trees of the petitioners lands and pass…” 2. Heard Sri Amanchi Royal, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 6. 3. The petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a direction for expeditious disposal of the appeal registered as File No:REV- DSECOROR(AD)/110/2025-SA-D2-KANDB-KDPCO, dated 16.06.2025 pending before the 3rd respondent-Joint Collector. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the appellate authority is bound to decide the case in accordance with the law expeditiously. 5. Ergo, this Court directs the 3rd respondent-appellate authority to make an endeavor, or to put to an end, by making all the efforts, in deciding the case with due diligence within a reasonable time for disposal of the appeal on merits and as per law, after hearing all the parties to the dispute, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, not beyond two (02) months from date of receipt of a copy this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 30.10.2025 TVN 58 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.28613 OF 2025 Date: 30.10.2025 TVN