Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40709 (CHH)

KRISHNA KUMAR GUPTA v. RITESH GUPTA

CR/238/2025 · 2025-09-15

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 238 of 2025 1 - Krishna Kumar Gupta S/o Late Manharan Lal Gupta Aged About 55 Years R/o Indra Chowk, Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ritesh Gupta S/o Vinod Kumar Gupta Aged About 43 Years R/o Near Bhatagaon Chowk, Ring Road No. 1, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Vinod Kumar Gupta S/o Late Manharan Lal Gupta Aged About 72 Years R/o Near Bhatagaon Chowk, Ring Road No. 1, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Usha Kirran @ Munni Bai D/o Late Manharan Lal Gupta Aged About 72 Years R/o C/o Krishna Gupta / Rajkumar Gupta, Indira Chowk, Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ku. Pramila @ Kiran Gupta D/o Late Manharan Lal Gupta Aged About 70 Years R/o C/o Krishna Gupta / Rajkumar Gupta, Indira Chowk, Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Rajkumar Gupta S/o Late Manharan Lal Gupta Aged About 62 Years R/o C/o Krishna Gupta / Rajkumar Gupta, Indira Chowk, Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 6 - Smt. Sheela Gupta D/o Late Manharan Lal Gupta Aged About 58 Years R/o C/o Krishna Gupta / Rajkumar Gupta, Indira Chowk, Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Tehsildar Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sourabh Sonwani, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Pandey, Government Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 16.09.2025 1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena