[2025:RJ-JP:41306] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Review Petition No. 5/2020 1. Smt. Nibbo W/o Late Shri Net Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Pandori, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur 2. Kumari Hemlata D/o Late Hri Netram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Pandori, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur 3. Hemandra S/o Late Shri Netram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Pandori, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur 4. Kumari Gudiya D/o Late Shri Netram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Pandori, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur ----Claimants/Petitioners Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Near Ajmer Pulia, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through General Manager 2. Bhoja Ram Driver S/o Shri Johari Lal, Resident Of Dahara Road, Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj) ----Non-Claimants/Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 10/10/2025 This review petition has been filed by the review petitioner as regards the order dated 03.05.2010 passed in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1648/2000 with a delay of 3474 days. So as to condon the delay in filing this review petition, an application CMCC No.197/2020 has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. On consideration of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants and the averments made in the [2025:RJ-JP:41306] (2 of 2) [CRW-5/2020] application, the only reasons shown as regards inordinate delay in filing this review petition is that the claimants-appellants are the resident of remote area therefore, neither they have contacted the counsel nor the counsel informed to them about the order passed in the appeal. The delay in filing the review petition is of 3474 days and the explanation submitted by the counsel for the review petitioners to submit his arguments and averments made in this application, the reasons shown cannot be said to be justified or sufficient cause to condon the inordinate delay of 3474 days in filing the review petition. Accordingly, the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is dismissed. As a result of dismissal of this application for condonation of delay, the review petition is also stands dismissed being time barred. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Sudha/31