1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9823 of 2025 1 - Santosh Kumar Yadaw S/o Budhiyar Ram Aged About 45 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Polampalli, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 2 - Lekhan Singh Netam S/o Ishwar Singh Netam Aged About 35 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Morpalli, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 3 - Baleshwar Kumar Bhuarya S/o Mannu Lal Bhuarya Aged About 48 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Nayapara Mukraj Konda, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 4 - Rudra Pratap Singh S/o Dhanau Singh Aged About 42 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kummapara, Palama Dgu, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 5 - Pramod Netam S/o Dukhuram Netam Aged About 38 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Tolnai, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 6 - Lakhan Lal Churendra S/o Bhunish Ram Churendra Aged About 46 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Potacabin Polamalli, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 7 - Ku. Kanta Sahu D/o Yogeshwar Prasad Aged About 37 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Potacabin Polamalli, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 8 - Ramkali Dhruw S/o Ghanshyam Singh Aged About 49 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Girls Ashram Chintagufa, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 9 - Kunjami Lachchhu S/o Kunjami Kosa Aged About 34 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Surpanguda, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.26 18:00:55 +0530 2 10 - Shanta Mandavi S/o Sadaram Mandavi Aged About 43 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Permapara Dubbatota, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 11 - Kadti Gulabi S/o Kadti Naga Aged About 35 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Potemadgu, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 12 - Nagu Soyam W/o Soyam Naraiya Aged About 41 Years Posted As Head Master And Posted At Govt. Primary School Permapara Dubbatota, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. 13 - Sadaram Mandavi S/o Gorelal Mandavi Aged About 55 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Navin Kanya Ashram Nagalgunda, Block Konta, District Sukma, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director Panchayat Department, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer Sukma Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat District Sukma Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 26/08/2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been 3 issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in WA No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika