NEPAL PRAKASH SAMANTA v. CUTTACK MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, CUTTACK
WP(C)/34241/2025 · 2026-01-13
V Narasingh
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 407 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 407 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.34241 of 2025
Nepal Prakash Samanta
…. Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
Cuttack Municipal Corporation, Cuttack, represented through its Commissioner
…. Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Swain, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 13.01.2026
01.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.
2. This is the third journey of the Petitioner to this Court ventilating his grievance regarding inaction of the Cuttack Municipal Corporation in completing the C.C Road and Park as per Tender File No.782 of 2025 and 783 of 2025 within a stipulated period in the interest of justice.
3. Taking note of limited nature of grievance, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Petitioner to pursue the representation which is stated to have been received by the Cuttack Municipal Corporation on 17.09.2025 as seen from p. 2 the endorsement on the body of the representation at Annexure-7. Such representation shall be disposed of within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The decision taken shall be intimated to the Petitioner at the address given in the writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge Soumya Designation: Jr. Stenographer