249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21496-2022 Date of decision: 08.05.2025 HARSH KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERS ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Gurpreet Kaur Sarabha, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Raghav Bali, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for respondent No.7. **** AMARJOT BHATTI , J (Oral): 1. Learned counsel for petitioners states that present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.80, dated 23.04.2021 registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 and 120-B of IPC at Police Station Khanna City-II, Police District Khanna (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising/emanating out of the impugned FIR as the parties entered into voluntary compromise (Annexure P-2) has rendered infructuous since the cancellation report was submitted. Therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the same. 2. In view of the statement, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn having rendered infructuous. 3. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 08.05.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.05.09 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document