Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40697 (CHH)

SURAJ BAIDEAD RAMPYARI v. GHANSHYAM @ RAJU MAHRAJ

MCC/727/2023 · 2025-01-17

Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:3236 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No.727 of 2023 1 - Suraj Baidead Rampyari D/o Sonulal Suryavanshi Aged About 45 Years R/o Chhoti Koni, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Jaikumari D/o Sonulal Suryavanshi Aged About 43 Years R/o Ganiyari, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Laxminarayan S/o Sonulal Suryavanshi Aged About 40 Years R/o Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Ramavatar S/o Sonulal Suryavanshi Aged About 38 Years R/o Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Trilokinath S/o Sonulal Suryavanshi Aged About 35 Years R/o Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Saraswati S/o Sonulal Suryavanshi Aged About 30 Years R/o Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 7 - Raju S/o Sonulal Suryavanshi Aged About 25 Years R/o Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ghanshyam @ Raju Mahraj S/o Khuluram Tiwari Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Gulmohar, Dhaba And Restaurant, Mopka, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Shri Abhijeet Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Shri Ruhul Ameen, Panel Lawyer SATISH TUMANE Digitally signed by SATISH TUMANE 2 Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal Order On Board 17/01/2025 1. Heard on admission. 2. This application (MCC) has been filed for restoration of S.A.No.374 of 2017, which was dismissed in default vide order dated 20.06.2023. 3. For the reasons assigned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. Accordingly, the application (MCC) is allowed and the order of dismissal passed by this Court on 20.06.2023 in S.A.No.374 of 2017 is hereby recalled and the S.A.No.374 of 2017 is restored to its original number. 4. Consequently, the MCC No.727 of 2023 stands disposed of. No order as to costs. SD/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) J U D G E Tumane