Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40694 (RAJ)

SAJNA KUMARI BAJIA W/O PRAHLAD GADWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13843/2025 · 2025-09-12

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:37159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13843/2025 Sajna Kumari Bajia W/o Prahlad Gadwal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Jat Colony, Ranoli, Po Ranoli, Dist- Sikar, Rajasthan -332403 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Ayush (Ayurved, Homoeopathy And Unani) Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Directorate Of Ayurved, Through Its Additional Director Ashok Marg Mali Mohalla, Ajmer, Rajasthan-305001. 3. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar, Nagour Road, Karwar, Jodhpur-342037 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sajna Kumari Bajia present in person For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 12/09/2025 1. Ms. Sajna Kumari Bajia, petitioner is present in person. 2. It has been submitted that the petitioner possesses disability certificate issued by the competent authority on 24.10.2024 and on the basis of such disability certificate, the petitioner submitted her application form for appointment on the post of Compounder/Nurse Junior Grade. She has acquired more marks than the cut-off marks declared by the respondent(s) for PH category, yet appointment has not been given only on the [2025:RJ-JP:37159] (2 of 2) [CW-13843/2025] basis of alleged medical report raising doubts about the genuineness of the disability certificate. 3. Petitioner submits that she is suffering from disability and her earlier certificate was genuine and she is still ready for re- examination by duly constitute medical board. 4. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the writ petition with the direction to the respondents to conduct medical examination of the petitioner to verify percentage of her disability in left lower limb in accordance with the rules. Medical board should consist experts in the fields and preferably the doctors either of SMS Medical College, Jaipur or AIIMS, Jodhpur. It is made clear that the doctors/medical experts, who were included in earlier medical board should not be part of fresh medical board. Report of the board be submitted to the appointing authority within a period of one month from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order and further action in accordance with law be taken after receiving copy of report of medical report. 5. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 6. It is made clear that no view has been expressed by this Court on merits of the case. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA SAINI /30