B S DAYANANDAMURTHY @ DAYANANDA @ CHINNY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.RP/567/2023 · 2025-11-13
Ravi V Hosmani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40693 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40693 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46265 CRL.RP No. 567 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 567 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
B S DAYANANDAMURTHY @ DAYANANDA @ CHINNY, S/O B.M.SRINIVASAMURTHY@JIPPY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT JIBHEEM NAGARA, 1ST STAGE, BANNUR TOWN, T.NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSORE - 571 124. …PETITIONER [BY SRI RAJU C N., ADVOCATE] AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MYSORE - 570 001. REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE.
2.
THE CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR BANNUR, MYSORE - 571 124, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS [BY SMT. N. ANITHA GIRISH, ADVOCATE (PH)]
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.397 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 14.03.2023 BEARING NO.MYSAC/MAG/MAG/EXTERNMENT /59/2022 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MYSORE BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by GURURAJ D Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46265 CRL.RP No. 567 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL ORDER
Challenging order dated 14.03.2023 bearing no.MYSAC- MAG/MAG/UÀ.¥Á/59/2022 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Mysore, this Revision Petition is filed.
2. Sri Raju C.N., learned counsel for petitioner submitted that period of externment under impugned order was for 2½ months i.e., from 14.03.2023 to 31.05.2023, which has been expired during pendency of this revision petition. Therefore, impugned order is spent.
3. Smt.N. Anitha Girish, learned HCGP for respondents does not dispute submission.
4. In view of above, revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24